<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Own Little Language</title>
	<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/06/02/your-own-little-language/</link>
	<description>A man needs a little madness, or else he never dares cut the rope and be free. -Nikos Kazantzakis</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/06/02/your-own-little-language/#comment-109</link>
		<author>Tom</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 16:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/06/02/your-own-little-language/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification on intent. And you did manage to get a fair number of clicks, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification on intent. And you did manage to get a fair number of clicks, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/06/02/your-own-little-language/#comment-107</link>
		<author>Jason</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 15:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/06/02/your-own-little-language/#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Tom, I will concede that by many definitions what I am talking about are DSL's.  I see DSL's as the "very high level" languages that Wikipedia refers to, which I don't think particularly fits my example.    However, if I were to be completely honest (with myself even ;)) I would admit that I am really just avoiding the term due to the surrounding hype.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, I will concede that by many definitions what I am talking about are DSL&#8217;s.  I see DSL&#8217;s as the &#8220;very high level&#8221; languages that Wikipedia refers to, which I don&#8217;t think particularly fits my example.    However, if I were to be completely honest (with myself even ;)) I would admit that I am really just avoiding the term due to the surrounding hype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/06/02/your-own-little-language/#comment-106</link>
		<author>Tom</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 15:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/06/02/your-own-little-language/#comment-106</guid>
		<description>Isn't a DSL a "a language custom built to take care of a small task"? &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain-specific_programming_language" rel="nofollow"&gt;See Wikipedia for example.&lt;/a&gt;

But in any case, "ANTLR by Example" sounds like a useful series. So thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t a DSL a &#8220;a language custom built to take care of a small task&#8221;? <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain-specific_programming_language" rel="nofollow">See Wikipedia for example.</a></p>
<p>But in any case, &#8220;ANTLR by Example&#8221; sounds like a useful series. So thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
