<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Java 1.6: Finally Integrating With The Underlying Platform?</title>
	<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/11/03/java-16-finally-integrating-with-the-underlying-platform/</link>
	<description>A man needs a little madness, or else he never dares cut the rope and be free. -Nikos Kazantzakis</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: GonAffefe</title>
		<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/11/03/java-16-finally-integrating-with-the-underlying-platform/#comment-79702</link>
		<author>GonAffefe</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 00:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/11/03/java-16-finally-integrating-with-the-underlying-platform/#comment-79702</guid>
		<description>Привет всем хотелось бы предложить вашему вниманию, 
&lt;a href="http://www.besteensporn.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;свежие горячие тины&lt;/a&gt; !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Привет всем хотелось бы предложить вашему вниманию,<br />
<a href="http://www.besteensporn.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">свежие горячие тины</a> !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/11/03/java-16-finally-integrating-with-the-underlying-platform/#comment-4182</link>
		<author>Jack</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 11:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/11/03/java-16-finally-integrating-with-the-underlying-platform/#comment-4182</guid>
		<description>Re the footnote: The Boost filesystem library is (probably/likely/almost certainly) going to be integrated into the next revision of the C++ library.

Also I think it's worth pointing out that the C people are in the same boat. All of the Unix-y things like terminal control and low level file access are in POSIX rathern than the base C standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re the footnote: The Boost filesystem library is (probably/likely/almost certainly) going to be integrated into the next revision of the C++ library.</p>
<p>Also I think it&#8217;s worth pointing out that the C people are in the same boat. All of the Unix-y things like terminal control and low level file access are in POSIX rathern than the base C standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ Noha</title>
		<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/11/03/java-16-finally-integrating-with-the-underlying-platform/#comment-3774</link>
		<author>DJ Noha</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/11/03/java-16-finally-integrating-with-the-underlying-platform/#comment-3774</guid>
		<description>The problem with system tray icons is not the potential for good, it's the potential for evil.  Every application and driver seems to feel it not only a right but a duty to put a useless icon in the system tray.  People who would never stand for applications or drivers taking up space in their task bar at all times (even when not in use) seem to have no problem with those same apps installing permanent system tray icons that serve as no more than shortcuts to launch the app.  I can't count the number of people I've watched click on app after app in their task bar, trying to find a specific window, because their system tray icons are taking up well over half of their task bar space, leaving almost none for applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with system tray icons is not the potential for good, it&#8217;s the potential for evil.  Every application and driver seems to feel it not only a right but a duty to put a useless icon in the system tray.  People who would never stand for applications or drivers taking up space in their task bar at all times (even when not in use) seem to have no problem with those same apps installing permanent system tray icons that serve as no more than shortcuts to launch the app.  I can&#8217;t count the number of people I&#8217;ve watched click on app after app in their task bar, trying to find a specific window, because their system tray icons are taking up well over half of their task bar space, leaving almost none for applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Payton Byrd</title>
		<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/11/03/java-16-finally-integrating-with-the-underlying-platform/#comment-3755</link>
		<author>Payton Byrd</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 18:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/11/03/java-16-finally-integrating-with-the-underlying-platform/#comment-3755</guid>
		<description>System Tray icons are vitally important for reducing clutter in the task bar of modern desktops.  The ability to have a strong mnemonic that can display a lot of data but only takes 16x16 to 32x32 pixels is very valuable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>System Tray icons are vitally important for reducing clutter in the task bar of modern desktops.  The ability to have a strong mnemonic that can display a lot of data but only takes 16&#215;16 to 32&#215;32 pixels is very valuable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sumfag</title>
		<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/11/03/java-16-finally-integrating-with-the-underlying-platform/#comment-3749</link>
		<author>sumfag</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/11/03/java-16-finally-integrating-with-the-underlying-platform/#comment-3749</guid>
		<description>System tray icons: many applications that wish to integrate with popular desktops on both Windows and Unix need the ability to use the system tray. It’s an expected part of the user’s desktop experience.

It's an undesired, annoying part of the user's desktop experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>System tray icons: many applications that wish to integrate with popular desktops on both Windows and Unix need the ability to use the system tray. It’s an expected part of the user’s desktop experience.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an undesired, annoying part of the user&#8217;s desktop experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/11/03/java-16-finally-integrating-with-the-underlying-platform/#comment-3747</link>
		<author>Sean</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/11/03/java-16-finally-integrating-with-the-underlying-platform/#comment-3747</guid>
		<description>Any word on when Java will FINALLY give access to ioctl and fctl?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any word on when Java will FINALLY give access to ioctl and fctl?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
