<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UnitTest++: The New Choice for C++ Unit Testing?</title>
	<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/12/18/unittest-the-new-choice-for-c-unit-testing/</link>
	<description>A man needs a little madness, or else he never dares cut the rope and be free. -Nikos Kazantzakis</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/12/18/unittest-the-new-choice-for-c-unit-testing/#comment-53802</link>
		<author>Ryan</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 16:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/12/18/unittest-the-new-choice-for-c-unit-testing/#comment-53802</guid>
		<description>Am I right in thinking to "install" this library I need to sudo cp the *.h and Posix/*.h to /usr/local/include/UnitTest++

and the .a to /usr/local/lib

Also, I am starting to dev on Mac OS X and am trying to get this set up on there. To USE the library do I need to include the lib and headers explicitly in my project, or should they be found automatically by XCode?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I right in thinking to &#8220;install&#8221; this library I need to sudo cp the *.h and Posix/*.h to /usr/local/include/UnitTest++</p>
<p>and the .a to /usr/local/lib</p>
<p>Also, I am starting to dev on Mac OS X and am trying to get this set up on there. To USE the library do I need to include the lib and headers explicitly in my project, or should they be found automatically by XCode?</p>
<p>Any help would be greatly appreciated.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philosophical Geek &#187; UnitTest++</title>
		<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/12/18/unittest-the-new-choice-for-c-unit-testing/#comment-34399</link>
		<author>Philosophical Geek &#187; UnitTest++</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2006/12/18/unittest-the-new-choice-for-c-unit-testing/#comment-34399</guid>
		<description>[...] There are a few very good resources for C++ unit testing. I first came across Noel Llopis&#8217; Exploring the C++ Unit Testing Framework Jungle. I was just about set on using CxxTest, just as he had decided, but realizing that the post was written at the end of 2004, I continued my research. Sure, something must have improved since then! I came across UnitTest++: The New choice for C++ Unit Testing. It turns out to be partially written by Noel Llopis, so I thought this must be good since he gave such good reviews of the earlier solutions. You can read more about it here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] There are a few very good resources for C++ unit testing. I first came across Noel Llopis&#8217; Exploring the C++ Unit Testing Framework Jungle. I was just about set on using CxxTest, just as he had decided, but realizing that the post was written at the end of 2004, I continued my research. Sure, something must have improved since then! I came across UnitTest++: The New choice for C++ Unit Testing. It turns out to be partially written by Noel Llopis, so I thought this must be good since he gave such good reviews of the earlier solutions. You can read more about it here. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
