<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Key Thing In Python&#8217;s Favour</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alittlemadness.com/2007/09/05/the-key-thing-in-pythons-favour/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2007/09/05/the-key-thing-in-pythons-favour/</link>
	<description>A man needs a little madness, or else he never dares cut the rope and be free. -Nikos Kazantzakis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:20:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2007/09/05/the-key-thing-in-pythons-favour/comment-page-1/#comment-39057</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alittlemadness.com/2007/09/05/the-key-thing-in-pythons-favour/#comment-39057</guid>
		<description>Reading code is about understanding intent, and good comments and a thought out system design in general are much more important towards that end.  A consistent indentation structure is nice, but how much does it REALLY give you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading code is about understanding intent, and good comments and a thought out system design in general are much more important towards that end.  A consistent indentation structure is nice, but how much does it REALLY give you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew J. Montalenti</title>
		<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2007/09/05/the-key-thing-in-pythons-favour/comment-page-1/#comment-39053</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew J. Montalenti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 14:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alittlemadness.com/2007/09/05/the-key-thing-in-pythons-favour/#comment-39053</guid>
		<description>Culture matters more to a language than most people think.  It&#039;s true that one can make Perl code readable, but most Perl code I see isn&#039;t.  Why?  Because culturally, Perl hackers love to take advantage of implicit variables, of clever one-liners, etc.

A Python program&#039;s readability is supported by language design choices, idiom, and culture.  A Perl program&#039;s readability is only _in spite of_ these things.  That&#039;s the difference.

(That said, I love using Perl for certain tasks!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Culture matters more to a language than most people think.  It&#8217;s true that one can make Perl code readable, but most Perl code I see isn&#8217;t.  Why?  Because culturally, Perl hackers love to take advantage of implicit variables, of clever one-liners, etc.</p>
<p>A Python program&#8217;s readability is supported by language design choices, idiom, and culture.  A Perl program&#8217;s readability is only _in spite of_ these things.  That&#8217;s the difference.</p>
<p>(That said, I love using Perl for certain tasks!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2007/09/05/the-key-thing-in-pythons-favour/comment-page-1/#comment-39043</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alittlemadness.com/2007/09/05/the-key-thing-in-pythons-favour/#comment-39043</guid>
		<description>About Perl...the &quot;readability&quot; thing gets a little old. If you can&#039;t make your Perl code readable don&#039;t blame Perl; blame yourself. You *can* write hard to read Python code. Ruby is not that much better than Perl if you want to throw the &quot;readability&quot; thing out there because the statement from Magnus about Ruby being a good compromise applies directly to Perl as well. The &quot;total flexibility&quot; of Perl is one of its many strengths.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About Perl&#8230;the &#8220;readability&#8221; thing gets a little old. If you can&#8217;t make your Perl code readable don&#8217;t blame Perl; blame yourself. You *can* write hard to read Python code. Ruby is not that much better than Perl if you want to throw the &#8220;readability&#8221; thing out there because the statement from Magnus about Ruby being a good compromise applies directly to Perl as well. The &#8220;total flexibility&#8221; of Perl is one of its many strengths.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magnus</title>
		<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2007/09/05/the-key-thing-in-pythons-favour/comment-page-1/#comment-39034</link>
		<dc:creator>Magnus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alittlemadness.com/2007/09/05/the-key-thing-in-pythons-favour/#comment-39034</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right - Python is very readable, nice and clean. But, in my opinion to a point were it gets a little boring - there are often only one way to do things. Perl on the other hand is totally flexible - but also completely unreadable. I think Ruby is a good compromise, it can be used to make clean readable code but there also a greater freedom for &#039;creative&#039; programming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right &#8211; Python is very readable, nice and clean. But, in my opinion to a point were it gets a little boring &#8211; there are often only one way to do things. Perl on the other hand is totally flexible &#8211; but also completely unreadable. I think Ruby is a good compromise, it can be used to make clean readable code but there also a greater freedom for &#8216;creative&#8217; programming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
