<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Caging Selenium With Xnest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alittlemadness.com/2009/03/10/caging-selenium-with-xnest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2009/03/10/caging-selenium-with-xnest/</link>
	<description>A man needs a little madness, or else he never dares cut the rope and be free. -Nikos Kazantzakis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:04:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2009/03/10/caging-selenium-with-xnest/comment-page-1/#comment-155930</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alittlemadness.com/2009/03/10/caging-selenium-with-xnest/#comment-155930</guid>
		<description>Hi Rohan,

Thanks for the tip, it sounds like I need to check out Xephyr too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rohan,</p>
<p>Thanks for the tip, it sounds like I need to check out Xephyr too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohan</title>
		<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2009/03/10/caging-selenium-with-xnest/comment-page-1/#comment-155620</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alittlemadness.com/2009/03/10/caging-selenium-with-xnest/#comment-155620</guid>
		<description>We do this for lots of our tests, however I recommend Xephyr over Xnest because Xephyr is closer in performance and features to a &quot;real&quot; X server (e.g. Xnest doesn&#039;t support many modern X extensions).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We do this for lots of our tests, however I recommend Xephyr over Xnest because Xephyr is closer in performance and features to a &#8220;real&#8221; X server (e.g. Xnest doesn&#8217;t support many modern X extensions).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

