<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Simpler Ant Builds With the Ant Script Library</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alittlemadness.com/2010/07/29/simpler-ant-builds-with-the-ant-script-library/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2010/07/29/simpler-ant-builds-with-the-ant-script-library/</link>
	<description>A man needs a little madness, or else he never dares cut the rope and be free. -Nikos Kazantzakis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:04:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2010/07/29/simpler-ant-builds-with-the-ant-script-library/comment-page-1/#comment-229667</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alittlemadness.com/?p=694#comment-229667</guid>
		<description>Hi Basil,

Thanks for the kind words.  The main reason I chose ASL was I found it the most approachable project: in a quick scan of all the project home pages it was the most clear, with the best documentation.  This made it the easiest one to try first.  It also doesn&#039;t hurt that I briefly met Joe at CITCON 2009, so had a face to put to the library.  I&#039;m not averse to giving the others a go when I get a chance!

Re: issues, I haven&#039;t found too many yet.  My main gripe so far is that the build does not fail on analysis failures (e.g. checkstyle violations, PMD problems) by default, which is the behaviour I would prefer.  I haven&#039;t dug into this deeply yet, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Basil,</p>
<p>Thanks for the kind words.  The main reason I chose ASL was I found it the most approachable project: in a quick scan of all the project home pages it was the most clear, with the best documentation.  This made it the easiest one to try first.  It also doesn&#8217;t hurt that I briefly met Joe at CITCON 2009, so had a face to put to the library.  I&#8217;m not averse to giving the others a go when I get a chance!</p>
<p>Re: issues, I haven&#8217;t found too many yet.  My main gripe so far is that the build does not fail on analysis failures (e.g. checkstyle violations, PMD problems) by default, which is the behaviour I would prefer.  I haven&#8217;t dug into this deeply yet, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Basil Vandegriend</title>
		<link>http://www.alittlemadness.com/2010/07/29/simpler-ant-builds-with-the-ant-script-library/comment-page-1/#comment-229664</link>
		<dc:creator>Basil Vandegriend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alittlemadness.com/?p=694#comment-229664</guid>
		<description>I found this really interesting and useful. Is there a reason you picked Ant Script Library to examine over the other two? Any issues or things to watch out for when using Ant Script Library?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this really interesting and useful. Is there a reason you picked Ant Script Library to examine over the other two? Any issues or things to watch out for when using Ant Script Library?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

